Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Burns-Vazquez Winner Will Have To Wait on Broner

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Thread For: Burns-Vazquez Winner Will Have To Wait on Broner

    BoxingScene.com has been advised that the International Boxing Federation [IBF] has approved the lightweight unification between their champion Miguel Vazquez (33-3, 13KOs), and the WBO's champion Ricky Burns (35-2, 10KOs). The fight is scheduled for March 16th at Wembley Arena in London.

    [Click Here To Read More]

  • #2
    Lol, predictable

    Comment


    • #3
      what has jose gonzalez done to be the WBO's Mando?

      Comment


      • #4
        Chelo is not ready for a title shot, his team needs to fall back.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by commodus View Post
          what has jose gonzalez done to be the WBO's Mando?
          He's Puerto Rican.

          Comment


          • #6
            Vasquez & Burns both beat Gonzalez EASY.......

            it's really a waste of time for either of them

            Comment


            • #7
              Broner fight winner then unify the division.

              Comment


              • #8
                Chelo should fight Darley Perez in February, and then fight Katsidis in May/June, and then the loser of Abril/Bogere in September/October. By that time, he would've gotten more exposure and the top guys will probably be outta the way.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Looks like we got an unofficial tournament going here.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Not an issue. The winner can simply vacate the belt of which ever ABC that doesn't wanna play ball. In turn, that sanctioning group will be getting 3% of whatever two bums they have fight for their vacant trinket opposed to the 3% they would be getting from having their title apart of Broner against the winner of this one, which I'm sure will be significantly higher.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP