Originally posted by The_Bringer
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Should Peterson, Berto and Tarver Be Banned for 4 years Like Larry Olubamiwo?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostWould you want a fighter banned for life if he did not take peds. but a mistake was made in the testing that made him look quilty?
I'll wait.....
Comment
-
It won't happen. Boxing disciplinary action has gone soft in the sport because it needs stars. I mean c'mon, the sport didn't even have the heart to suspend Margarito's license for more than a year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4Corners View PostI say this......
1st time: 1 year
2nd time: 2 years
3rd time: Life
4 years for the first time is too much. Margarito had f**king bricks in his gloves and was only banned for a year.
heres another idea. Money must be returned if a post fight test shows a positive result. ya i'm harsh. But this has to be delt with severely
Comment
-
Originally posted by FlatLine View PostLarry Olubamiwo, a UK fighter who tested positive for banned substances, has recently been banned for 4 years in total.
Should American fighters Lamont Peterson, Andre Berto and now Antonio Tarver also be banned for 4 years as a penalty for testing positive for banned substances?
I don't care much for Peterson or Berto but I'm still shocked about Tarver being tested positive, he's one of my favorite fighters. But nevertheless, I have to reluctantly include him in this equation.
Comment
Comment