Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Charley Burley at welterweight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Charley Burley at welterweight

    A lot of people rate Charley Burley as a top 10. welterweight, The Ring Magazine have him ranked as high as number 4, above even the likes of Sugar Ray Leonard.

    I was just wondering why this is? I can see why he's ranked so highly at middleweight, but his welterweight resume doesn't look all that great.

    I'm not studied Burley's career in all that much depth so was just wondering if anyone could explain.
    Last edited by Welsh Jon; 11-30-2011, 10:14 AM.

  • #2
    1.Sugar Ray Robinson
    Henry Armstrong
    Kid Gavilan
    Charley Burley
    Sugar Ray Leonard
    Carmen Basilio
    Jose Napoles
    Tommy Ryan
    Joe Walcott
    Emile Griffith
    Thomas Hearns
    Mickey Walker
    Jack Britton
    Ted (Kid) Lewis
    Barney Ross
    Jimmy McLarnin
    Luis Manuel Rodriguez
    Billy Graham
    Pernell Whitaker
    Roberto Duran

    Was the rings latest, did you mean SRL?

    Anyways I agree, he did beat Zivic and Cocoa kid at that weight but, i don't think that deserves a Top 5 ranking.

    However I'm not well versed on him.

    Comment


    • #3
      Welterweight was his best / prime weight, I don't know if the ring take his achievements from other weights and put him there because of that ?, I certainly wouldn't be able to find any room for him in a top 10 at Welter though.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Welsh Jon View Post
        A lot of people rate Charley Burley as a top 10. welterweight, The Ring Magazine have him ranked as high as number 4, above even the likes of Sugar Ray Robinson.

        I was just wondering why this is? I can see why he's ranked so highly at middleweight, but his welterweight resume doesn't look all that great.

        I'm not studied Burley's career in all that much depth so was just wondering if anyone could explain.
        four is a bit lofty perhaps
        and there's no way in hell he was a better WW than ray robinson (though the legend holds that robinson wanted no part of burley, it probably had a lot to do with money.)

        burley had trouble finding fights at all weights but he had the most at WW. so while his resume might not stack up against some of the best at WW, he gets some (perhaps too much,) credit for being the most avoided WW of all time.

        to the extent that i know, there is no film of his work at WW but he was reported to be a very special fighter at the weight
        eddie futch said he was the most complete fighter he ever saw.

        he was a now you see me now you dont boxer with a very hard punch and a granite chin (never stopped in almost 100 fights)
        very good defense. very hard to hit. very effective counterpuncher.

        really not a guy you want to fight unless the money is terrific, which unfortunately it never was.

        burley is certainly an ATG, but in a stacked division like WW it's hard to put a number on his "ranking"

        Comment


        • #5
          I did a thread a while back on the best WW's ever and he made my top 5, i base it on the fact that he fought there during his peak years alot, id call his best years around 1939-1942 and during that time he fought 12 times out of 27 at WW. He beat Holman Williams there, had the split decision loss with Zivic (who beat Armstrong) and that was twice avenged. I rate the guy and have no problem with that ranking though its obviously debatable

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Barnburner View Post
            1.Sugar Ray Robinson
            Henry Armstrong
            Kid Gavilan
            Charley Burley
            Sugar Ray Leonard
            Carmen Basilio
            Jose Napoles
            Tommy Ryan
            Joe Walcott
            Emile Griffith
            Thomas Hearns
            Mickey Walker
            Jack Britton
            Ted (Kid) Lewis
            Barney Ross
            Jimmy McLarnin
            Luis Manuel Rodriguez
            Billy Graham
            Pernell Whitaker
            Roberto Duran

            Was the rings latest, did you mean SRL?

            Anyways I agree, he did beat Zivic and Cocoa kid at that weight but, i don't think that deserves a Top 5 ranking.

            However I'm not well versed on him.

            Yeah sorry meant SRL. Need to edit that.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by The Surgeon View Post
              I did a thread a while back on the best WW's ever and he made my top 5, i base it on the fact that he fought there during his peak years alot, id call his best years around 1939-1942 and during that time he fought 12 times out of 27 at WW. He beat Holman Williams there, had the split decision loss with Zivic (who beat Armstrong) and that was twice avenged. I rate the guy and have no problem with that ranking though its obviously debatable
              Yeah forgot about Williams but, IMO he is a better MW than WW.

              Comment


              • #8
                Fritzie Zivic x2
                Cocoa Kid
                And Holman Williams

                Is a pretty strong 4 signature wins at a single weight.

                He beat other good fighters there too.

                May not justify a ranking over Ray Leonard and such. But it gets him into the Top 10. Despite having a better MW.

                I imagine their reasoning will be a lot down to H2H ability and skills aswell.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                  Fritzie Zivic x2
                  Cocoa Kid
                  And Holman Williams

                  Is a pretty strong 4 signature wins at a single weight.

                  He beat other good fighters there too.

                  May not justify a ranking over Ray Leonard and such. But it gets him into the Top 10. Despite having a better MW.

                  I imagine their reasoning will be a lot down to H2H ability and skills aswell.
                  I agree he's got a good welter resume, and he could easily break into a top 10 list, just don't see him as a top 5 welterweight. In terms of welterweight resume there's no way he's ahead of the likes of SRL, Emile Griffith and Jose Napoles.

                  I guess h2h ability could push him into the number 4 spot, though SRL, Griffith and Napoles were so good you'd have to be very confident of Burley's skills to push them down any welterweight list.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Welsh Jon View Post
                    I agree he's got a good welter resume, and he could easily break into a top 10 list, just don't see him as a top 5 welterweight. In terms of welterweight resume there's no way he's ahead of the likes of SRL, Emile Griffith and Jose Napoles.

                    I guess h2h ability could push him into the number 4 spot, though SRL, Griffith and Napoles were so good you'd have to be very confident of Burley's skills to push them down any welterweight list.
                    I don't have him in my personal Top 10 at WW.

                    Like others I rank him at MW, despite his prime being at WW. Simply because he did more there.

                    But I'd say he certainly has an argument for Top 10 at WW.

                    1.Sugar Ray Robinson
                    2.Henry Armstrong
                    3.Ray Leonard
                    4.Joe Walcott
                    5.Kid Gavilan
                    6.Emile Griffith
                    7.Jimmy Mclarnin
                    8.Barney Ross
                    9.Jose Napoles
                    10.Tommy Hearns

                    That'a my personal WW list. Who could he replace? Tommy Hearns maybe?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP