it's pretty close to me...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who has the better resume Pernell Whitaker or Manny Pacquiao?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostThose guys were naturally bigger than him and I agree they'd win. Hearns wasn't losing to a Welter who couldn't crack. I don't know, outside a few other super legends at 35, who I would favor to beat the best Pea at 35 or 40.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bombs View PostIs this some sort of a sick joke?? Pacquiao has one of the best if not the BEST resume of all time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MurkaMan View PostI think Pac's resume comes from him climbing weight classes...NO ONE has done it like he has
Sam Langford
Jimmy McLarnin
Roberto Duran (started around Bantam and won a Middle belt)
Tommy Hearns (beat men who won titles from 40 to Cruiser)
Roy Jones (Middle to Heavy across roughly the same weight span)
Henry Armstrong
It's rare but not first time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostIf you mean in terms of winning belts when there are four per class (at least), sure. Otherwise...
Sam Langford
Jimmy McLarnin
Roberto Duran (started around Bantam and won a Middle belt)
Tommy Hearns (beat men who won titles from 40 to Cruiser)
Roy Jones (Middle to Heavy across roughly the same weight span)
Henry Armstrong
It's rare but not first time.
Only one of those really comparable is Homicide Hank. . . Lol it's still funny that just about every fight he had was contested at a catchweight.
But to the TS's question, Pac has the better resume. . . Pac is the best southpaw of all time. . . .
Morales TWICE, Mab TWICE, Marquez TWICE? Cotto? Hatton (at his natural weight). . . CLottey (who everybody seems to underrated for some reason - but seeing how Pac is the ONLY BOXER to EVER beat him so one-sidedly). . .
Not to mention his slew of other wins against world champs, and fringe world class guys.
Comment
Comment