Adalaide Byrd seems to get a lot of stick over her scoring. Seen a lot of comments lately since she has been announced as judging Pac vs JMM 4
Personally I feel she is the best most unbiased judge in boxing and is a credit to the sport.
I am uncertain where the dislike has generated.
Okay she scored Trout v Cotto 119-109, I only gave Cotto 2 or 3 rounds myself and I am pretty sure those were swing-rounds that could of gone either way.
She scored Abril v Rios - 117-111 for Abril, that is great judging.
I've looked through most of her scoring and I genuinely can not see why people are against her judging.
Adalaide Byrd 114-113 (Hopkins over Calzaghe) is the only card I can find where I could maybe see people questioning it, again, this was a close fight!
I see she has been judging in a few controversial fights, but her scorecards are always bang on. So why the hate?
She is probably the best in the business. I hope she doesn't make me look a kn0b now and hand some ridiculous scorecard in
That is one judge I have faith in.
Personally I feel she is the best most unbiased judge in boxing and is a credit to the sport.
I am uncertain where the dislike has generated.
Okay she scored Trout v Cotto 119-109, I only gave Cotto 2 or 3 rounds myself and I am pretty sure those were swing-rounds that could of gone either way.
She scored Abril v Rios - 117-111 for Abril, that is great judging.
I've looked through most of her scoring and I genuinely can not see why people are against her judging.
Adalaide Byrd 114-113 (Hopkins over Calzaghe) is the only card I can find where I could maybe see people questioning it, again, this was a close fight!
I see she has been judging in a few controversial fights, but her scorecards are always bang on. So why the hate?
She is probably the best in the business. I hope she doesn't make me look a kn0b now and hand some ridiculous scorecard in
That is one judge I have faith in.
Comment