By actual accomplishments in the ring I voted for Froch. Price, Burns and Brook all have potential.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who is the best British fighter right now?
Collapse
-
-
frank warren talked about this a few weeks ago when he said burns was the number 1 british fighter, the reason because when froch stepped up he got beat vs ward. i would disagree and say froch got beat by a top 3 p4p fighter and burns has never faced the level of fighter that froch has
Comment
-
Originally posted by rampant View PostEasily Froch then Burns.
Is Haye an active boxer? Personally I dont think Haye should be in any rankings, I also dont think Mayweather should be part of any rankings.
Rankings should be for boxer who are active and fighting regularly, not once a year or once every 2 years.
Anyway, Froch is the obvious answer. You can make a case for someone like Burns but Froch's competition sets him apart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostI find them similar in how they treat boxing.
Anyway, Froch is the obvious answer. You can make a case for someone like Burns but Froch's competition sets him apart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BafanaBafana View PostDavid Haye (fast, slick and knock out guys much bigger than himself) is the best P4P but Froch has the better resume.
Honestly, Haye's a good boxer but he's too inactive and does not take enough risks.
You'd struggle to find anyone with Haye on their PFP top 10 list, but here and there you'll see even American posters with Froch on there from 8-10
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Weebler II View PostWell Ruiz and Chisora were shorter guys, Wlad and Valuev took him 12 so I can only assume you are talking about Audley?
Honestly, Haye's a good boxer but he's too inactive and does not take enough risks.
You'd struggle to find anyone with Haye on their PFP top 10 list, but here and there you'll see even American posters with Froch on there from 8-10
Comment
Comment