Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roy Jones: "Hopkins has ONLY beat small fighters"--DO YOU AGREE?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    How in the fucking hell has Hopkins built his legacy off "bigger" fighters???

    Comment


    • #12
      "But like I told y'all, all this improvement crap is a bunch of crap. The man ain't improve he got smarter and been fighting smart fights. And he's been picking his fights very smart. I'm not going to give him credit for being no improved fighter"---- Roy Jones on Hopkins

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
        yeah but hopkins didn't get KO'd by Tarver or Glen Johnson

        hopkins would have ko'd all those taxi drivers too, don't forget
        I still personally dont think BHop lost to Calzaghe either but thats a different argument

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
          yeah but hopkins didn't get KO'd by Tarver or Glen Johnson

          hopkins would have ko'd all those taxi drivers too, don't forget
          which is why he never moved up to fighter bigger fighters?

          who did he beat @ MW?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by chicano79us View Post
            How in the fucking hell has Hopkins built his legacy off "bigger" fighters???
            cuz the poll options are ******ed & biased. He fought how many "smaller" guys? Tito and Oscar? Even though Tito was a middleweight champion at the time. Oscar also fought at 160, sure he looked liike **** so he doesn't get too much credit there.

            That's it. Pavlik & Calzghe same size as bhop. Glen Johnson, Tarver bigger guys. All middleweights echols, allen, etc etc etc during 160.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Easy Work Jr. View Post
              who did he beat @ MW?
              you don't know how to use boxrec?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Easy Work Jr. View Post
                haha hell naw....just cause of names?

                Man RJJ would have Ko'ed Oscar, Tito, Winky, Taylor, & Pavlik...

                all these guys are small guys
                Coulda woulda shoulda...........RJJ is like Floyd.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by King_Lukas View Post
                  I still personally dont think BHop lost to Calzaghe either but thats a different argument

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Easy Work Jr. View Post
                    "But like I told y'all, all this improvement crap is a bunch of crap. The man ain't improve he got smarter and been fighting smart fights. And he's been picking his fights very smart. I'm not going to give him credit for being no improved fighter"---- Roy Jones on Hopkins
                    does anyone honestly believe this though? I mean seriously, watch hopkins in 1993 and compare that to 2001 and tell me hopkins didn't improve as a fighter.

                    don't take roy jones words so seriously, it's just talk. He doesn't even believe that.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
                      cuz the poll options are ******ed & biased. He fought how many "smaller" guys? Tito and Oscar? Even though Tito was a middleweight champion at the time. Oscar also fought at 160, sure he looked liike **** so he doesn't get too much credit there.

                      That's it. Pavlik & Calzghe same size as bhop. Glen Johnson, Tarver bigger guys. All middleweights echols, allen, etc etc etc during 160.
                      Pavlik?..fighting a MW @ LHW?...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP