115-113 Really?

[sunny31]

I thought John Keane had it about right, 118-110 maybe 117-111. For the record if you are going to make a new thread about something, try and get your facts right.

[Flab]

I gave Froch rounds 9, 10, 11 and 12. Nothing wrong with the scoring.

[The_Demon]

They must have felt sorry for Froch or something

[teddycanyon]

I gave Froch three rounds myself, I could see four, and if you really wanted to give Froch every round that was even somewhat close then maybe five rounds would have been acceptable. But no two ways about it, he was thoroughly outclassed.

[Boxing Bob]

to give Froch 5 rounds is inept, but at least the right guy won

[Oriachim]

I've never rated Carl Froch, how he was on boxingscenes pfp top 10 baffles me..

[Jim Tom]

Are you ******ed?
The British judge scored it 118-110 which was the right thing

[The Surgeon]

The latest in a long line of SHOCKING cards! Froch won a round... 2 at the VERY most. And even that might be being generous!

At least the right man won but FFS these judges need to be let go when they pull out these type of scores

[Flab]

I gave Froch three rounds myself, I could see four, and if you really wanted to give Froch every round that was even somewhat close then maybe five rounds would have been acceptable. But no two ways about it, he was thoroughly outclassed.

So was Pacquiao, somehow he won.

That Britsh judge should be shot, lol im english but that score was shocking 115-113, me thinks he'll be finding a new job very soon.

We needed a second thread on this subject, well done. You ****ing idiot.

As for the "British judge", he had it wide for Froch...... what does it take to open your ****ing EARS? Daft ****.