Rescoring fights from the son of a judge: Vol 5 Sergio Martines vs Chavez Jr

[FightScorer]

Rounds 1-11 10-9 martinez
Round 12 10-8 chavez

A monkey can score that fight

Nah. That score card is a bit wide.
But to be honest we had it close to the same.

You have the fight 11 rounds to 1 Martinez
I have the fight 9 Rounds to 3 Martinez.

At least I didn't have it 6-6.

[SPREAD]

115-111

Deal with it.

Let's see your round by round.

It was ruled a slip not a knockdown, there was one knockdown.

You actually could be a judge because you're ****ing shocking.

Stop scoring and delete your account.

Did you're dad do Bradley-Pac because that would explain alot.

[FlatLine]

Good post again, I'm enjoying these scorecards. People should give the guy some credit for putting up some of his own scores, it is all a matter of opinion so just debate it with some maturity when you disagree with the scores. Perhaps that's too much to ask from a lot of the kids on this site.

That last round I can't score it a 10-7 because Martinez came back in the round (as you stated). Had he been totally dominated in the round, and considering the knockdown, then 10-7 might be reasonable but given the fact he retaliated successfully it's a 10-8 in my book.

[Cállate!]

I completely agree with your scoring. Thank you and please do more!

[FlatLine]

And for those who don't understand the 10-7 statement that the threadstarter is making go watch the Mayweather vs Hatton UK version. Both the commentators gave Mayweather a 10-8 round in a round where he didn't even knockdown Hatton once - I think some of you don't understand scoring very well.

You don't have to knockdown someone in order for the other boxer to win a round by 2 points. If one fighter totally dominates another fighter in a round it could legitimately be scored 10-8, without any knockdown. The same goes, if a fighter gets knocked down in a round, and gets totally dominated in the round it could be scored a 10-7.

However like I said above, I disagree with a 10-7 in the case of this fight because Martinez didn't get totally dominated in the final round.

[Skip Bayless]

And for those who don't understand the 10-7 statement that the threadstarter is making go watch the Mayweather vs Hatton UK version. Both the commentators gave Mayweather a 10-8 round in a round where he didn't even knockdown Hatton once - I think some of you don't understand scoring very well.

You don't have to knockdown someone in order for the other boxer to win a round by 2 points. If one fighter totally dominates another fighter in a round it could legitimately be scored 10-8, without any knockdown. The same goes, if a fighter gets knocked down in a round, and gets totally dominated in the round it could be scored a 10-7.

However like I said above, I disagree with a 10-7 in the case of this fight because Martinez didn't get totally dominated in the final round.

if a fighter doesnt hit the canvas it is complete bull**** to give the other fighter a extra point in my opinion. hatton took a beating in round 10 but no way should it be 10-8, he should be rewarded for staying on his feet 10-9 is fair

[Ray*]

Am glad you aren't a real judge, it's scary reading some of your scorecard to be honest, I can excuse you watching it live ringside but to watch it on video and still return a scorecard like this one is a bit scary.

[Ray*]

if a fighter doesnt hit the canvas it is complete bull**** to give the other fighter a extra point in my opinion. hatton took a beating in round 10 but no way should it be 10-8, he should be rewarded for staying on his feet 10-9 is fair

Am agreed 100%, Yes Mayweather dominate the 8th round but hatton didn't hit the canvas in that round so no way was it a 10-8 round.

[FlatLine]

if a fighter doesnt hit the canvas it is complete bull**** to give the other fighter a extra point in my opinion. hatton took a beating in round 10 but no way should it be 10-8, he should be rewarded for staying on his feet 10-9 is fair

Why should it no way be a 10-8, the whole reason for the 10 point must system is to give leeway for exactly that purpose. If a fighter gets dominated in a round and lands virtually nothing in the way of return fire, not only is it fair to score it a 10-8, it should really be the norm to give that fighter less than 9 points.

You're awarding those points based on how well the fighter performs, not only based on who wins and who loses the round. Why would a fighter who gets totally dominated in a round still deserve 9 points, when (in a different fight) a fighter who puts up a good fight but doesn't do quite enough to win the round also gets the same 9 points?

Check out the rules of the 10 point must system for a better understanding of how it works.

[El Angel]

Don't agree with the 11th to Chavez Jr., if he won a round before the 12th, I think it was the 6th. And 10-8 in the 12th, Chavez Jr. didn't beat him that badly in the round to merit another point IMO.