Lennox Lewis in an interview said that even during the 90's he felt 3 belts cheapened the titles, now there are 4-6 and that totally devalues the champions.
Initially I tend to agree, but is that actually a good thing? One belt per weight class?
I think 2 is perfect tbh. Because we can have a unification match. One champion cleans up half the division, the other champion takes the 2nd half. They meet.
There really is pros and cons to having multiple belts though.
Initially I tend to agree, but is that actually a good thing? One belt per weight class?
I think 2 is perfect tbh. Because we can have a unification match. One champion cleans up half the division, the other champion takes the 2nd half. They meet.
There really is pros and cons to having multiple belts though.
Comment