Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do you think Wlad is better P4P than Pacquiao and Donaire?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
    What part of "it's easier to be efficient against crap opposition" don't you understand? Stats don't mean **** if you're fighting B level fighters.
    They become crap opposition because Wlad is beating them, they are B-level compared only to what is above them in class which is Wlad and Vitali.

    Interesting how the last resort of posters who want to discredit Wlad point to the fact that he can't just invent his own opponents or go back in time and fight ATG HWs.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Deathknight88 View Post
      Ruslan was a 5'11 guy who went life and death with the corpse version of John Ruiz.

      Stop it.
      He was other than big bro the highest ranked opponent available at the time and since your bringing up height beat Valuev so I don't see what that has to do with anything.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by Deathknight88 View Post
        Ok.. Let's do this comparison than.

        Sugar Ray Leonard is a 1st tier ATG.. You saying Wladimir is on par and a 1st tier ATG as well? Fine .

        Let us see.

        Sugar Ray Leonard Top wins: In whatever order
        Roberto Duran
        Tommy Hearns
        Marvin Hagler
        Wilfred Benitez
        Ayub Kalule






        Wladimir Klithscko top wins: In whatever order
        Chris Byrd
        Sultan Ibragimovic
        David Haye
        Tony Thompson
        Ruslan Chagev
        Eddie Chambers


        Ya... they are both 1st tier ATGS.. lol.

        In fact, Wladimir's BEST WIN: Chris Byrd. (who he UDed)
        Was already beaten by a 20 fight Novice name Ike.. Brutally beaten.
        People like you can't be reasoned with, there is no "debating" with you, because for every reason that you criticize Pac, Wlad, whoever... you give the fighters you like a free pass for the exact same reasons. You are an idiot, and everyone who isn't like you knows it.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
          They become crap opposition because Wlad is beating them, they are B-level compared only to what is above them in class which is Wlad and Vitali.

          Interesting how the last resort of posters who want to discredit Wlad point to the fact that he can't just invent his own opponents or go back in time and fight ATG HWs.
          That's bull****. If you can't tell the skill gap between even a Tony Tucker and god damn Mariuz Wach. You are blind.

          Wach was D Level.


          If you can't tell the skill gap between Andrew Golota who fought Bowe and between Jean Mormeck.. you are also blind...


          There is a thing call video evidence.

          What will make you happy?

          Tell me. Will it make you happy if we say the brothers are #1 and #2? All time Heavyweights? You are delusional and it is going from amusing to irritating real fast.
          Last edited by Deathknight88; 12-19-2012, 08:34 PM.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by kenso View Post
            People like you can't be reasoned with, there is no "debating" with you, because for every reason that you criticize Pac, Wlad, whoever... you give the fighters you like a free pass for the exact same reasons. You are an idiot, and everyone who isn't like you knows it.

            Kenso logic:

            This poster said Sugar Ray Leonard is 1st Tier. Wlad and Pacquaio is below SRL.

            Anybody that agrees with him is delusional.



            Normal boxing fan logic:

            SRL is >than Wlad and Pac.



            I'm delusional because I listed SRL'S top wins and how they destroy Wlad's top wins right?


            Say it Kenso. SAY IT. Type it out so I can sig it.

            Say it Kenso: WLADIMIR IS THE SAME TIER OF ATG AS SUGAR RAY LEONARD.

            TYPE IT OUT KENSO.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by Deathknight88 View Post
              That's bull****. If you can't tell the skill gap between even a Tony Tucker and god damn Mariuz Wach. You are blind.

              Wach was D Level.


              If you can't tell the skill gap between Andrew Golota who fought Bowe and between Thomaz Adamek.. you are also blind...


              There is a thing call video evidence.

              What will make you happy?

              Tell me. Will it make you happy if we say the brothers are #1 and #2? All time Heavyweights? You are delusional and it is going from amusing to irritating real fast.
              There have been some better HWs in the past yes just like there have been better WWs in the past who Pac can't fight now because he too doesn't have access to a time machine.

              Wlad can only beat and look impressive against who is available to fight and he has been for years, the guy can't do anymore and I think he is an overall more skilled fighter than Pac regardless of how we rate Pacman's opposition.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
                They become crap opposition because Wlad is beating them, they are B-level compared only to what is above them in class which is Wlad and Vitali.

                Interesting how the last resort of posters who want to discredit Wlad point to the fact that he can't just invent his own opponents or go back in time and fight ATG HWs.
                No they're straight up B level. Guys who wouldn't be in the top 30 in a good HW era.

                It's not a last resort it's the main thing that hurts Wlad's legacy, his poor opposition. Using punch stats to prove that Wlad is better than Pac is like using punch stats to prove that Deontay Wilder is better than Wlad.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by Light_Speed View Post
                  No they're straight up B level. Guys who wouldn't be in the top 30 in a good HW era.

                  It's not a last resort it's the main thing that hurts Wlad's legacy, his poor opposition. Using punch stats to prove that Wlad is better than Pac is like using punch stats to prove that Deontay Wilder is better than Wlad.
                  Not really they are two world class fighters fighting at the top of their divisions while Wilder fights cans and still may have worse punch stats than both for all I know.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    I don't think you can give much credit to Heavy weights there is just NO opposition what so ever that division has been **** for years.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Deathknight88 View Post
                      Ruslan was a 5'11 guy who went life and death with the corpse version of John Ruiz.

                      Stop it.
                      No he didnt. Chagaev looked very good in that fight, he beat Valuev clearly which is something Haye could do against a worse version and Ruslan also won his series 2-1 over Felix Savon, the first fight when he was only 18. Chagaev is a damn good fighter and would have been a belt holder or serious contender in any era.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP