I'd have to go with Nunn...he only has one loss at this weight and was at his absolute peak...only a knockout loss to James Toney in a fight he was dominating....Nunn was a tall lean long middleweight....Had a good right jab, great reflexes and footwork, underrated power....he could fight a high pace fight as well It would be a tall order for Maravilla....Nunn by UD
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sergio Martinez vs Michael Nunn at 160 who wins
Collapse
-
Sergio Martinez vs Michael Nunn at 160 who wins
11Nunn ko/tko27.27%3Nunn decision45.45%5Martinez KO/TKO27.27%3Martinez Decision0.00%0Tags: None
-
-
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View PostJust an honest question....have you ever seen Nunn fight? He aint no Barker or Paul Williams
Yeah, I've seen a few videos of him. I was being some what of a troll. Nunn had very good reflexes and he kind of swung from the elbows but he had a lot of power. His frame is bigger than Sergio's and I think that Sergio could hang with him for the distance but lose a decision.
Nunn was a pretty bad dude.
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostYeah, I've seen a few videos of him. I was being some what of a troll. Nunn had very good reflexes and he kind of swung from the elbows but he had a lot of power. His frame is bigger than Sergio's and I think that Sergio could hang with him for the distance but lose a decision.
Nunn was a pretty bad dude.
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Posthe is often forgotten....for a time was pound for pound one of the best late 80's early 90's
Comment
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostThey don't make guys like they did back then. They all had this determination, it wasn't about the money back then like it is now......it was about being the best.
Money has always played a part, if it didnt Charley Burley would have got a shot at the welterweight title or middelweight title against Robinson
Comment
Comment