Originally posted by Spartacus Sully
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Of all the science fields which eould you say have more say if there is a god or not?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Lazerjab View PostYo! you need a male and female to give eukaryote life..
No.
eukaryotes reproduce though splitting them selfs and in order for them to have first been given life they probly evolved from a Prokaryote neither of which has anythign to do with any thing im talking about as the first life was probly a virus or an archai.Last edited by Spartacus Sully; 02-11-2011, 01:29 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tengoshi View PostNo, by definition, science has nothing to do with such questions. What you conclude off the basis of its findings is irrelevant to the subject itself. It's amazing how unfamiliar people in this day and age are with philosophy. Your "theory" was elucidated centuries ago.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Russian Crushin View PostWell thats pretty much how it does work IMO
But the main point that people cant get is how life started
thus biology having the capability of quite an impact to the idea of whether there isnt a god.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lazerjab View PostYour telling me that some of the greatest scientist didn't make the conclusions that there is a god or not basing on what they learned in their particular field??
einstiens god is nothing more then a set of rules that came into existence with the universe, not creating the universe, and only concerned for how the universe conducts itself.....not a superior being that created life on earth and everything else we see and definatly not concerned with whether humans are sinners. spinozas god, nothing that exists can exists outside of nature so thus if there is a "god" he is with in the real of science.
once you start to turn god into a supernatural being he becomes super natural beyond nature and has long left the realm of science.Last edited by Spartacus Sully; 02-11-2011, 01:36 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartacus Sully View PostHA HHA AHA HA AHAH
No.
eukaryotes reproduce though splitting them selfs and in order for them to have first been given life they probly evolved from a Prokaryote neither of which has anythign to do with any thing im talking about as the first life was probly a virus or an archai.
But yeah you got me there I also believe they probably evolve from prokaryote..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lazerjab View PostYour telling me that some of the greatest scientist didn't make the conclusions that there is a god or not basing on what they learned in their particular field??
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartacus Sully View Postdefine god?
einstiens god is nothing more then a set of rules that came into existence with the universe, not creating the universe, and only concerned for how the universe conducts itself.....not a superior being that created life on earth and everything else we see and definatly not concerned with whether humans are sinners.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spartacus Sully View Postso as i said thats the idea but no ones been able to prove it happens. if biology were to prove thats how it happened id imagine it would disprove the idea that god created humans.
thus biology having the capability of quite an impact to the idea of whether there isnt a god.
Plus it is impossible to prove something, only provide theories
Comment
Comment