Khan obviously, Pacquiao is already an ATG
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Whose losses have been more damaging to their careers..Pacquiao or Khan?
Collapse
-
-
Khan by far
Pac's an ATG and an old fighter at the end of his career
he got KO'd by another ATG in a great fight
that loss doesn't take anything off his historical standing
Khan is in a career quandary if he loses again
Comment
-
Pac has been accused of good style match ups? But he was up against a so called really bad stlye match up against JMM, and someone as good as JMM to boot and was ahead on the cards making a mess of JMMs face and nearly stopping JMM, and this is supposed to be a real bad style match up, that Pac was not scared to take. Pac cant be criticised at all.
He lost but he was going for the ko at all costs, a true champ.
Comment
-
As all agree, Pacquiao is already a legend and all time great, who lost to another one. Khan has been "upset" twice on the trot. Including another knockout loss. Khan will never achieve what Pacquiao has and the losses make harder for him to even get close. Khan hasn't proved himself better than his peers let alone the very best in the sport.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MANIAC310 View PostKhan..... he got stopped by Prescott and Garcia. 1 is a borderline bum and the other is a mediocre champ.
Pacquiao got stopped by Marquez who is a HOF. Pacquiao himself doesn't have anything left to prove. He's a HOF and the greatest boxer of our time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MANIAC310 View PostThere's no real shame in losing to fighters of a certain level like.
Pacquiao, Marquez, Roy Jones, Mayweather, Margarito etc They're elite greats
but getting KO'd by Prescott is something to feel bad about
On the other hand, Lopez has a 50% KO ratio and that's after knocking out your boy Ortiz, now thats really something to feel bad about.
Comment
Comment