Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arazona Shooter Jared Loughner was a Leftwing Democrat

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Subtraction View Post
    His classmates aren't a credible source?

    Or the fact that he reads the communist manifesto?

    Of course, as you've admitted, you're going to believe what you want to believe despite the evidence.



    "credible source"= source that reaffirms your bias
    yeah, as ts has posted a source that only reaffirms his bias... what an idiot.
    I mean like a top reputed news agency.. cus who the fuck's ever heard of "newsmax" I sure as hell haven't..

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Subtraction View Post
      Hitler was a socialist and loved big government control.

      You lose.
      He was a fascist dictator. Everyone but you seems to know this. There was no 'big government control' because HE was the government. He did not even have a mechanism in place for replacing himself until the end of WWII. hitler was as socialist as kim jong-il, another autocrat.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by Sin City View Post
        yeah, as ts has posted a source that only reaffirms his bias... what an idiot.
        I mean like a top reputed news agency.. cus who the fuck's ever heard of "newsmax" I sure as hell haven't..
        You haven't heard of a lot of things so that doesn't surprise me.

        Originally posted by Nuurzhaelan View Post
        He was a fascist dictator. Everyone but you seems to know this. There was no 'big government control' because HE was the government. He did not even have a mechanism in place for replacing himself until the end of WWII. hitler was as socialist as kim jong-il, another autocrat.
        Fill in the blank.

        National _________ Party.

        Should I go slower?

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Subtraction View Post
          Hitler was a socialist and loved big government control.

          You lose.
          Hitler wasn't a socialist, he was a facist. If you knew anything about government or politics, you would know this. Because "socialist" was in the Nazi parties name does not mean the party is in fact socialist. Hitler was as far right wing as right wing could be.

          You are forgetting to mention that Hitler also locked Communists in camps and was fighting the CCCP, which was a Communist country. If he really shared the same ideology they wouldn't have been confrontational.

          but i'm not at all surprised at you trying to skewer the facts to fit your agenda.. after all, you are a neocon.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Subtraction View Post
            You haven't heard of a lot of things so that doesn't surprise me.



            Fill in the blank.

            National _________ Party.

            Should I go slower?
            You might need to do so, if only so that you understand that you are delusional. Man alive, you condemn the west for its revisionist history yet you expect us to believe that because Germany called its nation party the 'workers' party' all those years that it espoused any tenets associated with its moniker? You are only highlighting your myopia now.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Sin City View Post
              Hitler wasn't a socialist, he was a facist. If you knew anything about government or politics, you would know this. Because "socialist" was in the Nazi parties name does not mean the party is in fact socialist. Hitler was as far right wing as right wing could be.
              So even though they called themselves socialists I'm supposed to believe some harebrained ****sexual from Las Vegas because you said so?

              Hitler was a vegetarian, quite possibly a ****sexual and was for gun control.

              Fascism is when banks and corporations buy the government and rule. Like in the U.S.

              Like Obama's insurance co' bailout that you stupidly call "healthcare reform"..

              You know the one where the government is going to force people to BUY insurance from private corporations? The one that gives the big insurance companies 50 million new customers and has the IRS enforce non compliance?

              You knew about that right? After all, you know things right?



              You are forgetting to mention that Hitler also locked Communists in camps and was fighting the CCCP, which was a Communist country. If he really shared the same ideology they wouldn't have been confrontational.
              I'm not forgetting anything. Hitler locked up everyone who didn't pledge allegiance to him. Ideology also had nothing to do with the Russians, he wanted to conquer Europe and Russia was in the way.

              but i'm not at all surprised at you trying to skewer the facts to fit your agenda.. after all, you are a neocon.
              I'm a neocon now am I?

              Even though I'm anti war, anti torture, anti indefinite detention, pro constitution and pro liberty and pro peace?

              You're confused man.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Sin City View Post
                Hitler wasn't a socialist, he was a facist. If you knew anything about government or politics, you would know this. Because "socialist" was in the Nazi parties name does not mean the party is in fact socialist. Hitler was as far right wing as right wing could be.

                You are forgetting to mention that Hitler also locked Communists in camps and was fighting the CCCP, which was a Communist country. If he really shared the same ideology they wouldn't have been confrontational.

                but i'm not at all surprised at you trying to skewer the facts to fit your agenda.. after all, you are a neocon.
                His sources of information consist of whatever is said in extremist republican media and circles. Why bother? You won't change his biased perception of things.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Nuurzhaelan View Post
                  You might need to do so, if only so that you understand that you are delusional. Man alive, you condemn the west for its revisionist history yet you expect us to believe that because Germany called its nation party the 'workers' party' all those years that it espoused any tenets associated with its moniker? You are only highlighting your myopia now.
                  If you were in the party, it was a workers paradise.

                  The rest of your post is unintelligible. Stop trying so hard.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by BoxingTech718 View Post
                    His sources of information consist of whatever is said in extremist republican media and circles. Why bother? You won't change his biased perception of things.
                    What sources are those?

                    I'd rather be biased than ignorant and presumptuous. Do your homework before calling me out.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Subtraction View Post
                      If you were in the party, it was a workers paradise.

                      The rest of your post is unintelligible. Stop trying so hard.
                      Do you think the party advocated the doctrine implied by its name?

                      Is that intelligible enough for you?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP