Andrew Golata vs Frank Bruno

[SCtrojansbaby]

Both in their prime

who wins and how?

[dan_cov]

Bruno by K.O/TKO

[dan_cov]

Interesting fight actually being approx the same size, around the same reach. Both had a tendency to gas. Similar records against similar opposition with around the same K.O %

Brunos jab would be the key to victory IMO, I think he'd of frustrated Golota and broke him down inside 7.

If only they had of fought, they would of needed a compubox count for rabbit punches & low blows.

[Cardinal Buck]

Golata would win if he mentally held up. He probably wouldn't though, so I'll pick Bruno.

[D-MiZe]

Golota is the better fighter and would be leading on the cards until some bizarre incident occurred after which Bruno ends up with a victory.

[jackson8]

Bruno by knockout, maybe early cause Golota is a slow starter.

[Scott9945]

I wouldn't pick Golota to beat any legit heavyweight contender. History would back me up on this.

[joseph5620]

Golota is the better fighter and would be leading on the cards until some bizarre incident occurred after which Bruno ends up with a victory.

No he wasn't.

[jabsRstiff]

Golota was the more fluid guy and early on I think he'd outbox Bruno. He would hurt Bruno, who wasn't the toughest-chinned guy, but would be unable to take him out- considering he may be the single worst finisher in boxing history. Bruno would recover and start making a fight of it, and he'd eventually stop the nut.

[SBleeder]

I'd fall asleep somewhere during the third round, I think.

I dunno. Two very mediocre fighters here. Bruno by decision perhaps.