I'm looking at George Foreman, who didn't pick up a boxing glove until he was 18. He only fought for 1 year before getting gold at the olympics.
He was 24 when he won the heavyweight title, 6 years after he put on a glove for the first time in his life. Seth Mitchell put on a glove for the first time when he was 25. (well 24 years and 10 months.)
I know Foreman is a great fighter, but i'm only basing my argument on critics saying it was Mitchell's inexperience which cost him the fight. The same critics will say "this fighter started boxing when he was 8 years old, and that's why he won" but Joe Louis was another fighter who didn't put on a boxing glove until he was 18, and won the title 5 years later. (i'm sure there are more examples, but these are 2 very prominent examples.)
So what is there to say? Is it different when a fighter picks up boxing at age 18, and when a boxer pickes up boxing at age 25?
He was 24 when he won the heavyweight title, 6 years after he put on a glove for the first time in his life. Seth Mitchell put on a glove for the first time when he was 25. (well 24 years and 10 months.)
I know Foreman is a great fighter, but i'm only basing my argument on critics saying it was Mitchell's inexperience which cost him the fight. The same critics will say "this fighter started boxing when he was 8 years old, and that's why he won" but Joe Louis was another fighter who didn't put on a boxing glove until he was 18, and won the title 5 years later. (i'm sure there are more examples, but these are 2 very prominent examples.)
So what is there to say? Is it different when a fighter picks up boxing at age 18, and when a boxer pickes up boxing at age 25?
Comment