P4P, we all can put one man in front of the other. It is make belief and also the opinion of every fan or person.
However, within this make belief, we all need to be consistent with what we use in our P4P list.
What do you use to make your list if you have one?
I go by skills, talent, I also go by recent run(opponent faced in the last 3 years), i go by stylistically match up(who I think would win if both fighter were the same size, same height, same weight same reach) I take all that into account when I make my mythical opinion based ranking.
But, you need to understand not everybody has my criteria. Your criteria might different. You can get the 10 most knowledgeable boxing people and tell them to make a top 10 P4P list and all 10 list will be different in some way. So to think debating P4P is an actual "challenge" is funny to me.
I go by skills, talent, I also go by recent run(opponent faced in the last 3 years), i go by stylistically match up(who I think would win if both fighter were the same size, same height, same weight same reach) I take all that into account when I make my mythical opinion based ranking.
But, you need to understand not everybody has my criteria. Your criteria might different. You can get the 10 most knowledgeable boxing people and tell them to make a top 10 P4P list and all 10 list will be different in some way. So to think debating P4P is an actual "challenge" is funny to me.
But, anyways what's your criteria that you use?
And, show me your P4P list.
I have a similar criteria. I also have age as a factor.
OK so what is your list?
My list is:
1) Pacquiao.
2) Floyd (Al though I may take him out)
3) Donaire
4) Martinez
5) JMM
6) Bradley
7) Wlad
8) Hopkin's
9) Mares
10) Khan
I have no problem with anybody having Martinez being #1 P4P though. I can see that. Hell depending on how they finish the year Martinez can takeover Pac spot on my list.
And, Segura, Moreno, Wonjongkam, Hopkins and Mares are my next 5. And, any of those 3 can easily be in my 8-10 spot.
Comment