Tweet
I mean FOR ****S SAKE!!!
How low can you get?!
WHO IS CLINTON ****ING MITCHELL?!!!
How low can you get?!
WHO IS CLINTON ****ING MITCHELL?!!!
-
-
Clinton Mitchell was apparently a very good amateur according to John Scully and Hopkins had been in Jail for a long period of time. It's why he took a year and a half off, so he could fight at a weightclass more comfortable for him and learn new things. -
Fair point BUT losing to him?!Originally posted by warp1432 View Post
That's pushing it don't you think?Comment
-
Considering that Hopkins accomplished a lot better things in his career then Clinton and a ****load of boxers ever had. I think it makes up for it.
And I know you are doing this to piss people off, so it doesn't matter.Comment
-
It was his first fight! Most people would probably quit after something like that, but Bhop is a born warrior and he plunged forth.
How you finish is what matters. I think a win against the top ranked middleweight in 2008 more than makes up for what was basically an amateur match between two 0-0 fighters in 1988!Comment
-
A heralded amateur... you'd know that if you were a fan of the sport and not a Calzaghe-only fan.Comment
-
That loss was in 1988! That was during the Ronald Wilson Reagan administration for Christ sake!!!
Holding that against him is like some guy saying: I beat Michael Jordan back when he was a 4th grader. Its irrelevant.Comment
-
And??
Henry Armstrong was KO'd in his 1st pro bout by a nobody. Now what?
GET ... SOME ... EDUCATION, b4 posting.
http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...boxer&pageID=3Comment
-
F*** THAT!!!! CLINTON !@#$ MITCHELL beats PAVLIK, becuase Hopkins beat him, as a tuneup(he hasn't fought in a while), and then MITCHELL fights CALZAGHE!!Originally posted by Lord13 View Post
Mitchell now has a resume almost as good as Calzaghe's, just on beating Hopkins.Comment
-
Comment