as any other fighter looked as good or as competitive aged 35 as Joe Cal

[larryx]

calzaghe doesnt look good at 35!!!!wtf are you talking about.at 35 hopkins was way better//hell holyfield was better at 35

[sparked_85]

Have to reserve Judgement on Calzaghe.

Hopkins doesn't indicate one way or the other, he has an anti-style that makes everyone look sloppy.

[fightnews55]

Seeing as Calzaghe looks like a slappy, sissy boy that couldn't hurt a fly I would have to say yes!

[DanielTurcotte3]

Hopkins looked better at 36 then Calzaghe at 35. Trinidad was undefeated at 40-0 when hops beat him at that age.

Beat is being nice. He demolished a seemingly invincible Trinidad at the time. The beating he received was beyond anything physical. The mental and emotional beating he got that night killed Tito's fighting spirit. And it was sad, cuz he a once a great fighter!

[DanielTurcotte3]

I think Tarver looked better then Claz at 35, KOing Roy, beating him again, 2 good fights with Glencoffe Johnson, both close, 1-1 in those fights.

[Derranged]

PRoblem for Joe is that is hands are ruined. Thats why he has to "slap".

[Ryn0]

I think Tarver looked better then Claz at 35, KOing Roy, beating him again, 2 good fights with Glencoffe Johnson, both close, 1-1 in those fights.

Nah Tarver's entire career is beating a weight drained Roy Jones, if Roy had managed to maintain his physical tools on the way down from HW to LHW then Tarver would be a nobody, Calzaghe would not be the favourite to win this fight and Roy would proberbly have retired by now.

[daggum]

you call what calzaghe does looking good?

[RichCCFC]

Long answer short, no.

[MANGLER]

Holyfield, Hopkins, Toney, all got mention in here and were goin just as strong if not stronger than Joe C in their mid 30s.