Originally Posted by savorduhflavor
You did always change the subject.
Dawson fought the top dogs in the division at the time. And he was contractually obligated to grant Tarver a rematch. You cannot criticize his opposition.
I like Dawson, but I also really like Pascal. It's true, I'm at a loss to explain the fight, but I will maintain that Dawson beats Pascal in a rematch. Pascal deserves credit, he whooped that ass, but I will always believe it was an aberration.
I don't know what smh means, I'm actually curious cause I see it all the time, I just don't speak in internet abbreviations.
I know you are well aware of the fact that I've been a Dawson detractor, but if Hopkins does what I think he is gonna do tonight, Chad's stock is gonna plummet big time not just because he let Pascal beat him. But also because we haven't even seen him in the ring since that fight.