Originally Posted by Dick Gore
I'm not a Mexican!!!
I never changed the subject, I always maintained the same position. Who cares about talent?
Mayweather MIGHT be the most talented at WW, but he never fought nobody worth a damn so its a moot theoretical argument that doesn't hold water.
Pascal was talented enough to win pretty much every round, so Dawson isn't all that great.
You're just a Dawson nuthugger who can't admit he was wrong and get over a loss.
Still hanging on the theoretical abstractions.
You did always change the subject.
Dawson fought the top dogs in the division at the time. And he was contractually obligated to grant Tarver a rematch. You cannot criticize his opposition.
I like Dawson, but I also really like Pascal. It's true, I'm at a loss to explain the fight, but I will maintain that Dawson beats Pascal in a rematch. Pascal deserves credit, he whooped that ass, but I will always believe it was an aberration.
I don't know what smh means, I'm actually curious cause I see it all the time, I just don't speak in internet abbreviations.