View Single Post
#21
Old 12-18-2010, 01:28 PM
savorduhflavor
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,357
Rep Power: 29 savorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond reputesavorduhflavor has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 100,021,284,412.36
Bank: 1,504,578,479,128.31
Total Points: 1,604,599,763,540.67
Good post in my thread man.  Have a gift. - ABOSWORTH :fing02:  i couldnt remember how it happened but i remember him bleeding from the ear! thanks - mellow_mood I wish more Cotto fans were like you. - street bully Good poster - Old Coward great poster - Dick Buffman 
Arthritis - Child Abuse - Colon Cancer - Colorectal Cancer - Dystonia - Education - Free Speech - Interstitial Cystitis - ME/CFIDS - Reye's Syndrome - Save the Music - Teens Against Smoking - Victim's Rights - Water Quality - street bully Cultural Diversity - Hunger - Leukemia - Lupus - Melanoma - Racial Tolerance - Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome - Self Injury - VictoriaBeckham 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Gore View Post
I'm not a Mexican!!!




I never changed the subject, I always maintained the same position. Who cares about talent?

Mayweather MIGHT be the most talented at WW, but he never fought nobody worth a damn so its a moot theoretical argument that doesn't hold water.

Pascal was talented enough to win pretty much every round, so Dawson isn't all that great.

You're just a Dawson nuthugger who can't admit he was wrong and get over a loss.

Still hanging on the theoretical abstractions.

smh...
You did always change the subject.

Dawson fought the top dogs in the division at the time. And he was contractually obligated to grant Tarver a rematch. You cannot criticize his opposition.

I like Dawson, but I also really like Pascal. It's true, I'm at a loss to explain the fight, but I will maintain that Dawson beats Pascal in a rematch. Pascal deserves credit, he whooped that ass, but I will always believe it was an aberration.

I don't know what smh means, I'm actually curious cause I see it all the time, I just don't speak in internet abbreviations.
Reply With Quote
savorduhflavor is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<