Originally Posted by Freedom Fighter
You always discredit them.
It's easy to pick holes in any fighter's resume. You can be an assh
ole and sit back and say all his opponents are bums. Some fool could say all of Tyson's opponents were bums, or all Ali's opponents were no good.
But the truth is, Wlad has dominated a lot of very good heavyweights and stopped a LOT of fighters who had never been stopped before. Lennox Lewis only stopped ONE opponent who had never previously been stopped, Wlad has stopped at least 15.
Some of those like Brock, Barrett, Bostice, Shufford, McCline, Peter and others were surprisingly highly regarded BEFORE they fought Wlad but never the same after being brutally beaten. Other good heavyweights like Axel Shultz and Sultan Ibragimov retired after being dominated by Wlad.
The highlighted means nothing. If I beat 10 guys that are all 1-0, then that means I just stopped 10 fighters who have never been stopped before. Doesnt mean anything in terms of greatness, especially if those opponents were not top fighters in the division.
His dominance is impressive, and I give him a lot of credit for that.
pretending like Shufford, Bostice, and Barrett are good wins is what makes you such a joke sometimes on these forums. Ive already stated that Brock, McCline and Peter were good wins as well.
your bias makes you look like a jackass all the time(although its on the internet so it doesnt really matter), and it shows again when you try to make someone like me out to be a Klitschko hater, when in reality I hold them in higher regard than most other people and only put Wladimir about 5 places lower than yourself.