Originally Posted by Argentina_
You ***** and moan so much about Pacquiao facing off against a black slick fighter, That fight was horrible for Eriks style. You don't even know **** Burner
Morales had a great fight camp and was feeling in good shape. Dude stated he was better than ever, Moving up in weight was the problem that's all. He wasn't the same fighter at 135. At 130 when he faced off Pacquiao he still had gas in the tank, Which was noticeable in his first fight against Pacquiao. But clearly he wasn't in his best days which were at bantam.
Stick to the Floyd talk and stop trying to act like you know everything about each boxer, I've followed Eriks career since I was a little kid and payed attention to the Tijuana media about him all my life and heard about him every day. You want to tell me you're right and I'm wrong?
Oh and btw
Morales > Floyd
Bro...I have followed Morales as well, although I have missed news here and there due to the language barriers at the time. I always tell people that no shot fighter puts on the back to back performances that Morales did against Marco and Manny.
Also people punish Morales for failing to do something no Mexican has ever done; which is win a title in a 4th class. Not to sound disrespectful by any means, but Mexicans just don't have the body types to move up and down weight classes like that (history has shown us that). If they did, then legendary fighters like Chavez and others would have done it a long time ago but it has never happened.
So why say he was shot because he couldn't do what no Mexican has ever done? While I haven't done the research, I'm willing to bet they all looked just as bad as he did in there fourth class as well.