Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Are Oscar's Ring Magazine P4P Rankings Biased?
View Single Post
Old 05-09-2009, 03:40 AM #3
Mike_Dee Mike_Dee is offline
mathematical whiz kid
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,001
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 14
Mike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond reputeMike_Dee has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 70,206.03
Bank: 1,621,514,436.63
Total Points: 1,621,584,642.66
Default

yes, the ring's p4p list is biased towards golden boy fighters. before the Pacquiao- hatton fight, Hatton was at number 8. No other respectable P4P list had Hatton in the top 10 before the fight.

Hatton at number 8? wtf

but jmm deserves his 2 spot of course
Mike_Dee is offline   Reply With Quote