View Single Post
#1
Old 04-07-2009, 04:35 PM
PrettyBoyRoy 88
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,078
Rep Power: 0 PrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond reputePrettyBoyRoy 88 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,010,017,983.74
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 1,010,017,983.74
Default Is Bernard Hopkins using Kelly Pavlik as a measuring stick against Chad Dawson?

In recent interviews that I have seen of Hopkins on the topic of fighting Dawson, he sorta sounds like "I beat Pavlik, a 26 year old young lion, I can beat Dawson like that too"
Pavlik is the Middleweight Champion of the world, Chad Dawson is the light heavyweight Champion of the world. Is it right for Hopkins to say he can beat Dawson whilst using Pavlik to actually compare how he would do against Dawson? If Pavlik fought Dawson at 170, would Dawson beat him up worse than Hopkins did?

Hopkins has nothing to prove and has a lot of food in his plate, has a busy schedule, is an executive at Golden Boy Promotions, and color commentator for ESPN. Calzaghe retired and that's the fight i wanted to see(Hop vs Cal II) now the only fight that makes sense is Dawson. If not then, Bernard Hopkins my man, just retire you're already a legend.
Reply With Quote
PrettyBoyRoy 88 is offline
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<