View Single Post
#6
Old 02-14-2013, 11:40 AM
straightleft
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Under your girlfriend's bed!
Posts: 3,600
Rep Power: 18 straightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond reputestraightleft has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 69,037.95
Bank: 14,843,173,202,467.83
Total Points: 14,843,173,271,505.78
No Message - straightleft No Message - straightleft No Message - straightleft have a  cup - sugarsmosley 
Default

Pac ko Morales in Morales vs Pac 2 but there was a rematch.
Pac tko Barrera in Barrera vs Pac 1 but there was a rematch.

The list could go on for the same reason. It is all about the money. Pac has 2 wins against Marquez not to mention it should be 3 because of the admitted judge scoring error vs Marquez 1 win against Pac. So it was 3 > 1 in favor of Pac.

If Pac beat Marquez again in a close fight or better ko him for good. There should be no rematches. These two fighters are are evenly matched but Marquez legacy is only based on his 1 win vs Pac 3 wins.

You think Marquez won all those first 3 fights but that was just your opinion. In reality those were all close fights and far from a robbery like you are trying to say. If you want to learn about boxing robbery then watch Pac vs Bradley fight and Pac didn't even cry for it everyday and like a man just accepted it as it is.

Last edited by straightleft; 02-14-2013 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
straightleft is offline