Thread: Broner vs Rees
View Single Post
#6
Old 02-12-2013, 03:26 PM
Tom Cruise
Co.cktail
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reading UK
Age: 23
Posts: 3,829
Rep Power: 24 Tom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond reputeTom Cruise has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,110,000,179,231.86
Bank: 100,666,566,898.46
Total Points: 1,210,666,746,130.32
thanks for the green! - jose830 enjoy the beer and the boobies :beerchug: - jose830 Thanks for the green...eat a healthy burger :D - jose830 
Troop and Military Support - Amber Alert - Bladder Cancer - Endometriosis - Equality - Liver Cancer - Liver Disease - Missing Children - POW/MIA - Spina Bifida - Suicide - HUGH JASS 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taansend View Post
Thanks Lads,

Ross might be right with the cut or even swelling angle.

Tom - is Broner bigger? I know he has a longer reach but aren't they the same height? Or am I wrong? And Rees appears stockier.

Does anyone have their measurements? I'd like to see the wrist & forearm measurements. I remember when Leonard fought Norris & Terry's forearm measurements were like Popeye to Olive Oil compared to Ray.
I got Broner at 5"7 (according to boxrec) and Rees at 5"4 (according to wikipedia), how authentic they are i have no idea.

I think the size difference will be noticeable in the ring despite Rees having fought at a higher weight... we will know better when they do face to face stuff though
Reply With Quote
Tom Cruise is offline