Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Reading UK
Quoted: 419 Post(s)
Total Points: 3,000,298,532,961,104.50
I just dont get Agnosticism
I hear a lot of my friends, and other people, declaring themselves Agnostic at the moment, I just dont see the point.
Their justification is that it is more scientific to acknowledge the possibilty that a god(s) exist than to outright deny it. Ok so if I acknowledge the very small possibility (IMO) that there is an all controlling god or gods, then surely, going by scientific principals, I would only believe in it if there was proof that it/they existed? Thereby making the 'god' a part of science and a rationable explainable being which does not require any element of faith to believe in it.
Do we need a new a classification for people who acknowledge the possibility that when they are inside the sky turns red? or who think there is a small chance they are the subject of a 'Truman Show' type program? (dont lie we've all been there)
Have I misunderstood what Agnosticism is? Are there any Agnostics on this forum who would argue against?