Originally Posted by D-MiZe
You know you're clutching at straws when you go down the path of using an '0' to make a point.
Not really Mize, i could make a much longer argument as to why Ward has a ways to go yet to surpass Calzaghe, but it'll just be glossed over.
So I might as well just point to the fact that all of Wards best wins had lost before and were blueprinted.
Funny how all Joe's opponents became **** after he beat them but were considered good before that.
Do i need to dig out the Lacy/calzaghe predictions again