Here is the story:
Guerrero has only 2 wins at WW and we are supposed to say that he is positively going to beat Floyd or has a very good chance?
Go see the other thread named "Jesus Soto Karass Pounds Selcuk Aydin To Win" That's right, the same Aydin that gave Guerrero trouble. Some may say but that was his first fight at WW, give him a break. True but he has only had 1 other fight at WW!
Bad Logic: So give him a break after fight 1 at WW but after fight 2 at WW, he is ready for Floyd?
Same story: Ortiz did what Guerrero did in beating Berto. Guerrero remember also had the tapes of that fight to study when formulating a game plan. So Ortiz lost to Floyd and now Lopez at WW. So why are some people falling for the same sh$tty formula of opponents for Floyd?
Zab Judah: Here is all you have to know:
"Guerrero is a good boxer" ...... "Floyd is an outstanding boxer"
There are other clues by Mosley ......
Last edited by ADP02; 01-27-2013 at 01:03 PM.