Originally Posted by IronDanHamza
I don't hate Khan at all. I was rooting for him against Peterson and considered him to be the best fighter at 140.
Khan-Peterson could have gone either way (With the point deductions) and I scored it marginally for Peterson. So yes, the loss was legit.
So no, he wasn't the man at 140 at all.
Not sure what the Bradley-Pacquaio part has to do with anything. Unless you genuinely believe that that fight is comparable to Peterson-Khan
It wouldn't surprise me considered you think Cotto-Mayweather was a robbery
Guess what. Some guys are unbiased in their scoring. And no way did Peterson win the Khan fight. Even with the point deductions I had Khan ahead by a few points.
As for Cotto-Mayweather: not everybody is on the american hype train where you believe everything HBO sells you. I just scored the fight the way it was, and like other unbiased boxing guys, I had Cotto winning it.
That must really hurt you, right? Since Mayweather is your hero