Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Why do people think Mares would be more competitive than Rigo vs Donaire?
View Single Post
#35
Old 01-06-2013, 11:08 AM
fvanesbeck
Interim Champion
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 544
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Rep Power: 7 fvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond reputefvanesbeck has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,000,044,277.83
Bank: 219,168,743.22
Total Points: 10,219,213,021.05
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by puga View Post
what makes you say mares aint on that level but rigo is?
1) Amateur Pedigree: Mares was a good amateur, Rigo was a great amateur.

2) Nature of victories: Rigo has dominated most of his opponents, Mares has scraped by quite a few opponents. Surely if he's truly an elite fighter he'd be winning in more dominant fashion.

3) Athleticism: I think Rigondeaux is a far superior athlete, which would serve him well against Donaire.
Reply With Quote
fvanesbeck is offline