Boxing Forum - View Single Post - floyd beat cotto, trout beat cotto
View Single Post
Old 12-26-2012, 04:07 PM #7
Grimgash Grimgash is offline
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Age: 30
Posts: 2,437
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Rep Power: 20
Grimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond reputeGrimgash has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 22,000,047,483.09
Bank: 14,830,275,537,368.20
Total Points: 14,852,275,584,851.29
Send a message via AIM to Grimgash
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Gallo Negro! View Post
That's weird. I though he fought Cotto "at his best weight, 154"
That quotes directed towards Cotto. Cotto felt his best weight was 154. Floyds is definitely not 154, though I don't expect him to fight Trout because Floyd isn't Cotto. Floyd cares a lot about money and it's just not there to fight him even if he gets a super majority of the purse. Fighting mexicans on mexican holidays will make him more.

Not saying I agree with it, but everyone knows this fact. I just don't understand why we need so many threads to keep telling us something we already know.
Grimgash is offline   Reply With Quote