Originally Posted by Russian Crushin
The only time it shouldnt be #1 vs #2 is when for example Cotto was ranked #1 and then Floyd beating him made Floyd #1 and then cotto was bumped down to #2. Obviously it doesnt make sense that a rematch would give a Ring title so #1 vs #3 is acceptable
Floyd beat JMM more then 3 years ago, and now JMM has hes risen to #2 with basically 2 wins over Pac since then. Even if it is a rematch, thats the fight that gives us the best WW
All these new bullsh1t rules from Ring are just that, bullsh1t. It just gives guys like Larry more thread ideas
3 years ago isnt that long first of all. secondly, its a fight thatwill not happen and if it did, floyd would get crucified for taking, because, he beat him more than convincingly last time. i just dont see why it matters in this case. i mean the rules are **** but in this particular case its the right decision. unless u want floyd/jmm...again.