Originally Posted by ElBossHogg™
just because it is 7-5 dont mean it close means it was fair matched bout where their was a winner.
well there are different kinds of "7 rounds to 5- fights".
There was e.g. Malignaggi vs Juan Diaz I which was in my opinion a fight in which Malignaggi pretty clearly won 7 rounds and Juan Diaz pretty clearly won 5 rounds. So I agree in that fight it was wrong to give Diaz the win.
But when you look at Cunningham vs Adamek II, then you can see that there were almost no rounds which one fighter clearly won cause all of them were pretty much razor close.
So in a close fight like that, I really cannot understand the argument that it was a robbery, even if I would have scored it 7 rounds to 5 for Cunningham (which I didn't)