Not wearing Nikes
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: **** Nike
Quoted: 854 Post(s)
Total Points: 584,281,480,997,415,026,688.00
Originally Posted by BRITISH LlON
I don't know how the press scored it, but I heard 3 pple commentating on the NBC broadcast and they had it the way I saw it: as a razor close fight, a draw or a close Cunningham victory.
Anybody who wants to tell me Cunningham "clearly" won this fight, doesn't know what he is talking about.
Almost every round was very very close.
EDIT: now I watched press scores from here: http://fightscorecollector.blogspot.co.at/
almost EVERYBODY from the press who scored it for Cunningham, had it 115:113
which is 7 rounds to 5 which is VERY CLOSE.
I also had it for Cunningham, but only by 1 point.
So I have no problem with anybody scoring it 115:113, but those people who cry robbery and say it was at least 8 rounds to 4 are ....well....
7-5 or 8-4 Cunningham is acceptable, there's no scenario that you can make for Adamek winning that fight and then to have him winning 8-4, is a slap in the face.