Originally Posted by Freedom.
I've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.
I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.
I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.
But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).
Neither Klitschsko fought tonight mother****er. I'm glad you had Adamek winning. You had half a % respect from biased fans like yourself, and now you have zero respect. You had Adamek winning 7 rounds, and you say Steve ran too much? Remember this, and remember this well since you like to bring up the K brothers you phony bastard lol. Lennox and Byrd own Vitali, and Purrity, Brewster, Williamson, and Sanders R.I.P own your heroes. Fake ass, lmao!
You had Adamek winning 7-5. Hilarious!