Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Washington, DC
Total Points: 8,725,315,237,170.94
OoOo..... That's where your problem is from.... Cant remember me discrediting the Klit bros in that manner (I rarely post in their threads) but if you have a post of mine stating otherwise please feel free to post it (just searched for you.... didn't find anything)
Originally Posted by Freedom.
I've seen around the websites that most Americans (including those in the media) had Cunningham winning, while most Polish viewers had Adamek winning.
I'm neither American like Cunningham, nor Polish like Adamek. I saw a very close fight.
I thought Adamek won 115-113 (despite some pretty footwork and jabs from Cunningham) because he landed the cleaner, harder power punches and he took the fight to Cunningham who ran too much.
But there is no point in arguing. The only way Adamek would be given credit is if he KOed Cunningham, and even then you'd just say Cunningham was no good anyway (same way you discredit the Klitschkos by saying their opponents were no good).
Nobody is out to get the K-Bros (at least not me) but that still doesn't change Tko 6.... It happened it burns I know.... But let it go