View Single Post
#22
Old 12-19-2012, 10:16 AM
oc9979
Bad Intentions
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Jax, Fl
Age: 27
Posts: 7,365
Rep Power: 21 oc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond reputeoc9979 has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 230,224,851,918.82
Bank: 2,338,973,213,029.83
Total Points: 2,569,198,064,948.65
sharing tv link - Sir TomJones 
Mourning - Anti-Gang - Melanoma - jazluvr449 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by techliam View Post
I'm not necessarily saying Trout is the best at 154 either. Trout has beat more 154 fighters than Mayweather though. I'm just asking what there is that makes Mayweather the best at 154. That Cotto win certainly isn't it. Head to head, a lot of people see either Trout or Canelo beating Mayweather because they are much bigger.

As for the Pacquiao thing, i'd take issue for that if Pacquiao was seen as no.1 at 154 back then, too. Mayweathers title at 154 is legitimate, no problems with that. Mayweathers ranking as best at 154, is not (for me).

If you do not see Floyd as #1. Who is your #1 at 154?
You can't just say he is not #1 but do not post who is the #1.
Reply With Quote
oc9979 is offline