View Single Post
#13
Old 12-14-2012, 12:55 PM
Light_Speed
SPEED IS POWER
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 11,327
Rep Power: 54 Light_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond reputeLight_Speed has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 246,000,200,149.02
Bank: 2,225,005,037,030.18
Total Points: 2,471,005,237,179.20
Good poster - dancovboxer can't green you right now, but here's a gift. good poster - chiguy91 smart man - Alx. Thanks for Stream dude much appreciated - Berges For the Pac shooting gun video - Libido Sanchez 
No Message - chiguy91 thanks for posting the matthysse exhibition - chiguy91 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-MiZe View Post
For Christ sake...

When you make a claim that someone can fight off the ropes, I expect to see someone who's actually good at it. Anyone can stand with their back towards the ropes and bob & weave and land shots.
Show me clips of Khan doing that.

You just watched a guy knock his opponent the F out while being on the ropes and you said he can't fight off the ropes. It's one thing to say he's not great or he's not good but to say he can't fight off the ropes after what you saw is just retarded.

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-MiZe View Post
It's like saying someone can fight on the backfoot 'cause they threw a few jabs and straights. Yes, most people can fight on the backfoot but some do it exceptionally well and only then are they recognised as someone who can fight on the backfoot.
No most people cannot fight on the backfoot, plenty of fighters can't. And a fighter has to do something exceptionally well before you can say that he can do that thing? What a moronic thing to say. It's like saying Pacquiao can't counter because he's not an exceptionally good counterpuncher.

Quote:
Originally Posted by D-MiZe View Post
It's not even up for debate, I'm just trying to help you save face for the future.
I don't have to take lessons in saving face from someone who thinks Brook is the future and the Jones fight was just an off night. Tells me all I need to know about your ability to assess talent...

Last edited by Light_Speed; 12-14-2012 at 01:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
Light_Speed is offline