Originally Posted by Big Dunn
But all defenses are not equal. Its almost the same argument as Vitali's KO percentage. Is it numbers or is it quality?
Dariusz on paper makes a great case. But if you can't properly guage his competiton, its proper to not vote him in.
What did Hill do more of than him? How can you not properly gauge his comp? You want to make a case that he's not a HOFer generally, I'm all ears. Agree for various reasons.
BUT I didn't vote for Hill for a lot of the same reasons. Great stats, but much more hat than cattle there. Head to head, there is no reason one would be in and not the other.
Well, one reason: the voters. Same reason it took Yuh over a decade to get in.