Boxing Forum - View Single Post - When is it viable to compare fighters from different era's
View Single Post
Old 12-08-2012, 04:41 PM #7
Panamaniac Panamaniac is offline
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Francisco/Panama City
Posts: 1,381
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Rep Power: 12
Panamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond reputePanamaniac has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,000,118,606.62
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 10,000,118,606.62
It was private before, fixed it. - HaglerSteelChin 
Default When is it viable to compare fighters ofdifferent eras?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rightsideup View Post
...I was wondering what criteria is required to compare fighters from different era's. Please feel free to post your thoughts.
If it must be done at all, anytime is as viable as it will ever be. The only criterion would be the pre-existence of the fighters. Nothing can ever be proven, it's strictly speculative and subject to personal biases. It's always good debate fodder on forums of this nature.

Last edited by Panamaniac; 12-08-2012 at 04:43 PM.
Panamaniac is offline   Reply With Quote