Boxing Forum - View Single Post - Does size REALLY matter?
View Single Post
Old 12-06-2012, 09:12 PM #5
The Tase The Tase is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,687
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
The Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond reputeThe Tase has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 1,244,108.84
Bank: 1,910,687,908,228.25
Total Points: 1,910,689,152,337.09
i remember this mofo "rif raf" from this old show called from G's to gents :lol1: he's afocking waste of space...thanks for the green! - jose830 A glass of the finest French wine (thx for k) - QuebecSTAR2 on me - sugarsmosley I hear you lad - Rocky... wears his heart on his sleeve - jas 
Default

guns dont kill people. people kill people.

size dont win fights. fighters win fights.

size is only an issue if both fighters are so evenly match but one fighter is just so much bigger.

pac proved that. tyson proved that. henry armstrong proved that by holding 126, 135, 147 & 160 at the same time but was robbed.

what kind of roids was amrstrong using?
The Tase is offline   Reply With Quote