Thread: harry greb
View Single Post
#6
Old 12-06-2012, 06:06 PM
SBleeder
Undisputed Champion
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Indiana
Age: 33
Posts: 3,390
Rep Power: 19 SBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond reputeSBleeder has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 10,005,309,820.03
Bank: 0.00
Total Points: 10,005,309,820.03
for being a heavyweight in history section - led wipe your dirty mouth - -Ironmike- I heard you like men - -Ironmike- The "I hate Tyson" award of the year - -Ironmike- Good posts. - Barnburner 
No Message - -jose- you suck dick, i will kick you. - Weltschmerz training for your debut to suck dick,! - Weltschmerz 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTMB View Post
it is intellectually dishonest to rank fighters with no fight footage.

it just is.

especially a fighter with two sets of records; his official one and newspaper one.

greb should not be ranked ahead of other atgs with extensive fight footage where you can make a honest analytical take of their boxing career and skills.
Lack of footage makes things difficult, but an examination of Greb's resume, coupled with what was said and written about him, tells us that he was a phenom. To rank him behind fighters who had the fortune to be born in the television era is most certainly "intellectually dishonest", and unfair.

I rank him 4th P4P behing Robinson, Armstrong, and Gans. At 160, I rate him a shade behind Robinson.
Reply With Quote
SBleeder is offline