Originally Posted by RlCKY
I never understood that thought process. The guy challenging for the title has to "do more" to win it. How much "more" is enough to "do" to win a given round?
Fights should be scored without regard of who happens to be the guy that has the little piece of leather with some metal on it.
You shouldn't try to understand it cause its complete BS. That just means the one fighter is already down the cards when the fight is signed. How is that even possible?