Originally Posted by RIZO24
Whoever had Floyd winning is crazy.. He did not do nearly enough to take the title from the champion.. Look at the championship rounds and see who was backing who up and who was landing way more.
I never understood that thought process. The guy challenging for the title has to "do more" to win it. How much "more" is enough to "do" to win a given round?
Fights should be scored without regard of who happens to be the guy that has the little piece of leather with some metal on it.