Join Date: Dec 2009
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 9,371,058,876,928.99
In order to be the greatest of all time, do fighters have to face adversity?
It seems in order to be considered the greatest of all time or one of the greats, you have to either have wars, go life and death with various opponents or at least lose a few times throughout your career.
Without getting too specific and naming names, rarely do you see someone dominate several divisions over an extended period of time and get credit for it. Normally, (insert fighter) list of opponents somehow get discredited along the way.
So the main point/concern at hand is should we advise this new generation not to win to convincingly, but in turn try to have at least 2-3 "wars" with a top ranked opponent and look like they're struggling so their legacy can go down in history as one of the greats?
Feel free to discuss.