Originally Posted by Deathknight88
I 100% agree with Hopkins Pac Calzaghe and Mayweather.
But how is Cotto better or achieved more? I agree the issues with Wlad is competition and of course he was knocked out twice in his prime.
But, he should still rightfully be ranked higher than Miguel Cotto?
That's why I said only 4 are inarguable. Cotto hadn't achieved more in the sense of title defences etc but it could be argued that he has done better due to competition. Don't you think Marquez is inarguably better than Wlad too? There is no way that Calzaghe is better than Marquez, so if you agree with me that Marquez is better than Wlad too then you can't put Wlad in the top 5.