Join Date: Nov 2012
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 75,422.78
Your opinions: Has boxing progressed or regressed:Modern vs 60's-80's
I'm not talking about black and white days. Forget that. Let's just start from the 60's.
60's-80's vs Modern (90's era to current)
Do you think boxing has progressed since the 60'-80's era? In terms of skill level?
I want more of an overall comparison, the cream of the crop(Lennox,Floyd,Roy,Evander) will always be the cream of the crop. Regardless of eras.
I'm talking like comparing the Froch/Cotto/Haye to fighters of their standings/rankings during the older days.
Please don't ever bring the 'track and field' logic into any boxing debate. Running in a straight line have literally nothing to do with two men fighting.
Track rarely deal with the intangibles boxing deal with, so it's a horrid comparison.
My personal view:
The best of the best for the modern era:
Lennox,RJJ,Floyd,Hopkins,Pacquiao,Holyfield,Tyson, Whitakker, is equal to the older days of the 60's70's and early 80's.
But the 2nd tier have fallen off dramatically.
Last edited by WolfGirl; 11-21-2012 at 05:17 PM.